Introduction

Contextualizing digital well-being in contemporary work environments

The integration of digital technologies has radically transformed the configuration of organizations and production modes (Piñeyro Prins & Estrada Narvaez, 2019). This phenomenon, often referred to as the fourth industrial revolution, has generated a digital economy that is changing business structures and processes (Marqués Marqués, 2020). The widespread adoption of digital tools has redefined work interactions and the management of strategic objectives (Piñeyro Prins & Estrada Narvaez, 2019). In this context, the study of digital well-being in the professional field has acquired increasing relevance, given that technology not only facilitates productivity but also exerts a considerable influence on the worker experience. The adaptability of companies to this dynamic environment is directly linked to their robustness over time (Cardona & Hernández Cobos, 2010).

Problem statement and relevance to organizational health

Hyperconnectivity, although beneficial, has led to the emergence of new symptoms in individuals, requiring specialized attention to mental health in the digital environment (De La Mora-Espinosa & Ortega-Martínez, 2019). Current challenges for the business community include absenteeism and low productivity, factors that are aggravated by the lack of adequate digital well-being (Marqués Marqués, 2020). The health and well-being of workers are fundamental to corporate sustainability (Marqués Marqués, 2020) (Nogueira, nd). Recent studies identify that a significant percentage of professionals may experience Burnout Syndrome or be at risk of developing it, with mental workload and psychosocial risk factors as the main causes (Flores et al., 2014). The discussion about mental health in the Colombian workplace has highlighted the need for organizations that promote health and well-being (Gómez Vélez & Calderón Carrascal, 2017).

Thesis and objectives of the analysis

This analysis examines the integration of digital well-being into contemporary workplace policies and practices. It proposes that proactive management of digital well-being is essential for organizational health and resilience in an increasingly digitalized workplace. Specific objectives include: (1) conceptualizing digital well-being in the workplace; (2) identifying psychosocial risks associated with hyperconnectivity; (3) describing existing organizational models and regulatory frameworks; (4) assessing systemic impacts on worker health and productivity; and (5) formulating strategic recommendations to foster a healthy digital workplace.

Thematic Overview: Conceptual Review and Evolution of Digital Workplace Wellbeing

Definition and fundamental dimensions of digital well-being at work

Digital well-being in the workplace refers to the optimal state of mental and psychological health that individuals maintain when interacting with digital technologies and platforms throughout their daily lives. This concept transcends the mere absence of dysfunction to encompass an improved quality of work life, where satisfaction with the occupational structure is positively correlated with subjective well-being (Santos, 2000). Its dimensions include screen time management, data privacy, preventing information overload, and promoting conscious technological practices that prevent burnout and subjective suffering (De La Mora-Espinosa & Ortega-Martínez, 2019). Health is understood as a state of comprehensive well-being that includes social, physical, and mental aspects (Karen Andrea Mora-Durán et al., 2019) and Blesa Matienzo, 2020.

Historical evolution of digital interaction in professional environments

The relationship between technology and work has progressed from initial mechanization to the current ubiquitous digital transformation (Piñeyro Prins & Estrada Narvaez, 2019). Organizations have modified their structures, processes, and products to respond to a dynamic environment (Cardona & Hernández Cobos, 2010) (Oliveira & Crispim, 2020). This evolution has led to the reconfiguration of jobs, the adoption of knowledge management models, and the search for collaborative synergies among staff (Fuster, 2020). Technology, particularly telemedicine, has demonstrated its capacity to facilitate care and protect healthcare professionals in emergency contexts (2020), underscoring its growing integration into critical functions.

Psychosocial and technological risks associated with workplace hyperconnectivity

Constant exposure to digital technologies generates various psychosocial risks. Mental workload, burnout, and exposure to psychosocial risk factors are significant concerns (Flores et al., 2014). Hyperconnectivity can lead to a blurring of the boundaries between personal and professional life, with teleworking accelerating these dynamics (Irusta & Ingrassia, 2020). This can increase subjective suffering, making ongoing mental health support essential (De La Mora-Espinosa & Ortega-Martínez, 2019) (Fussi, 2020). Risk prevention and health promotion are key elements for improving employment quality and occupational well-being (Nogueira, n.d.).

Organizational models and regulatory frameworks on digital well-being

International regulations and emerging legislation

Occupational health is a field in which regulations have evolved to ensure safe and healthy working conditions (Gómez Vélez & Calderón Carrascal, 2017)(nd). Many countries have implemented occupational health and safety management systems, which are mandatory for all institutions (Moreira Castellanos, 2020)(nd). These laws seek to create environments for self-care, prevention, and health promotion, in addition to addressing occupational accidents and diseases (Gómez Vélez & Calderón Carrascal, 2017). Occupational Nursing, for example, has seen its framework of action expanded to include preventive, healthcare, legal, and management competencies (González Caballero, 2019).

Institutional practices and policies: state of the art

Organizations are developing new management models that integrate digital well-being into their strategic planning (Fierro-Celis, 2020) and (2019). Building a favorable organizational climate is recognized as critical for human development and business success (Fuster, 2020). (Novaes Pillar de Oliveira Castro et al., 2016). Organizational culture influences management behavior and vice versa (Parolin, 2009). The development of digital skills in staff is encouraged to support these changes (Piñeyro Prins & Estrada Narvaez, 2019). Internal communication is also considered a crucial dimension in the study of organizational climate (Segredo-Pérez et al., 2017).

Impact Analysis: Systemic Consequences and Contemporary Challenges

Repercussions on the mental and physical health of workers

The constant demand for digital attention can overload individuals, affecting their overall well-being (Karen Andrea Mora-Durán et al., 2019) (Blesa Matienzo, 2020). Subjective suffering, exacerbated by current working conditions, can manifest itself in employees’ mental health (Gómez Vélez & Calderón Carrascal, 2017) (Fussi, 2020). A study on nursing staff, for example, reveals percentages of dissonance in spiritual well-being, a component of overall health, even in environments with a high percentage of overall harmony (Gómez Ramírez et al., 2018). This underscores that even in professions dedicated to caring, individual well-being can be compromised. Positive psychology, which focuses on character strengths and the conditions for human flourishing, offers a counterpoint to the study of pathologies (Sánchez Estrada, 2011).

Implications for productivity, motivation and work engagement

A decline in digital well-being is associated with lower levels of productivity and reduced work engagement (Marqués Marqués, 2020). When workers experience burnout or digital stress, their ability to focus, innovate, and actively engage in their tasks decreases. The organizational climate, which encompasses employees’ perceptions of their work environment, directly influences their satisfaction and performance (Novaes Pillar de Oliveira Castro et al., 2016). The lack of a positive work environment can lead to absenteeism, which is a concern for management (Marqués Marqués, 2020). Human talent management, from recruitment to performance evaluation, aligns with organizational objectives and occupational health (Moreira Castellanos, 2020).

Structural barriers to the implementation of digital wellbeing strategies

Ethical dilemmas and managing the balance between control and digital autonomy

The implementation of digital technologies in the workplace raises significant ethical dilemmas, particularly in the balance between organizational control and individual autonomy. Teleworking, for example, accelerates the need to sort out stimulating, driving, or detracting factors that influence the organizational environment, the workplace, and the family (Irusta & Ingrassia, 2020). Digital employee monitoring, while potentially improving efficiency, can also generate tensions and raise questions about privacy (2019a). Ethical considerations in the use of data and the monitoring of digital performance become fundamental.

Technological inequalities and generational gaps

Digital transformation can exacerbate existing inequalities. The digital divide, manifested in differences in access to technology, digital skills, and understanding of new tools, can marginalize certain segments of the workforce (Piñeyro Prins & Estrada Narvaez, 2019). Generational differences also influence adaptation to technologies, as not all employees have the same level of familiarity or comfort with digital environments. Addressing these disparities is essential to ensure that digital well-being strategies are inclusive and benefit the entire workforce.

Conclusions and Strategic Proposals for the Future of Digital Workplace Wellbeing

Critical summary of findings and lessons learned

The preceding analysis has outlined the complexity of digital well-being in the workplace. It is observed that the adoption of digital technologies redefines organizational configuration and worker health (Piñeyro Prins & Estrada Narvaez, 2019) and Marqués Marqués, 2020). Hyperconnectivity, although offering advantages, also introduces significant psychosocial risks, such as burnout and subjective suffering (Flores et al., 2014) and De La Mora-Espinosa & Ortega-Martínez, 2019. Organizational health depends on attention to employee well-being (Nogueira, nd). The importance of building a positive work environment and the influence of organizational culture on managerial behavior are recurring aspects (Fuster, 2020) and Parolin, 2009. Mindfulness, for example, has been shown to be a relevant factor in enhancing health and psychological well-being (Goilean et al., 2020).

Recommendations for the effective integration of digital well-being into labor policies

To cultivate a healthy digital work environment, the following strategic actions are suggested:

1. Well-being-oriented strategic planning: Integrating digital well-being into the organization’s strategic planning, considering knowledge management and information culture (Fuster, 2020) (Arce Solano et al., 2019).
2. Safety and health management systems: Implement and strengthen occupational health and safety management systems (OHSMS) that address psychosocial and technological risks (Moreira Castellanos, 2020)(nd).
3. Promoting a positive organizational culture: Promoting a work environment that values communication, autonomy, and work-life balance, using positive psychology approaches (Segredo-Pérez et al., 2017) (Sánchez Estrada, 2011).
4. Digital skills development and literacy: Provide ongoing training in digital skills to reduce gaps and ensure that all employees can adapt to technological changes (Piñeyro Prins & Estrada Narvaez, 2019).
5. Conciliation and family responsibility policies: Develop policies that support the conciliation of work and personal life, including family responsibility (Jiménez Figueroa & Gómez Urrutia, 2014).

Lines of research and future action in the face of organizational digital transformation

Digital transformation is a constantly evolving process, demanding ongoing research and action (Cardona & Hernández Cobos, 2010). Future research could delve deeper into the long-term effects of teleworking on mental and physical health, as well as the development of predictive models of digital well-being. It is necessary to explore the interaction between artificial intelligence and employee well-being, and how organizations can adapt their strategies to address the emerging challenges of automation and robotics (Marqués Marqués, 2020). The creation of standardized tools for assessing digital well-being and the implementation of evidence-based interventions will be crucial to ensuring sustainability and prosperity in the future of work.

References

Piñeyro Prins, RM, & Estrada Narvaez, GE (2019). Redesigning the Organizations of the Future. The Impact of Digital Transformation on the World of Work. In VI International Congress on Interpersonal Relations “Human Development in Times of (Re)evolution 4.0” (Vol. 1, Issue 1, pp. 199–226). Civil Association of Higher Studies (ACES) Austra University. https://doi.org/10.26422/icf.20193cong06.pin

Marqués, F. (2020). Workplace health and wellness programs as a lever for business sustainability. In ICE Economic Bulletin (Issue 3119). MINCOTUR. https://doi.org/10.32796/bice.2020.3119.6955

Cardona, D.A., & J.S. Hernández Cobos (2010). Organizational development. In Knowledge, Science and Freedom (Vol. 5, Issue 1, pp. 83–94). Free University. https://doi.org/10.18041/2382-3240/saber.2010v5n1.2536

De La Mora-Espinosa, RI, & Ortega-Martínez, MC (2019). Hyperconnectivity and Psychoanalysis. In Transdisciplinary Journal of Migration Studies (pp. 23–33). ECORFAN. https://doi.org/10.35429/jtms.2019.17.5.23.33

Nogueira, NFR (nd). Occupational safety assessment, health and well-being – Case study in the bitumen-rubber industry produced in situ in Portugal . University of Leon. https://doi.org/10.18002/10612/10741

Flores, D., Vega, V., Del Río, C., & Zavala, D. (2014). Addressing the well-being of healthcare professionals: A pending challenge. In Chilean Journal of Occupational Therapy (Vol. 14, Issue 1, p. 33). University of Chile. https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-5346.2014.32386

Gómez Vélez, MA, & Calderón Carrascal, PA (2017). Mental health at work: between suffering at work and healthy organizations. In Katharsis (Issue 23, p. 177). University Institution of Envigado. https://doi.org/10.25057/25005731.871

Santos, FR (2000). Satisfaction, well-being, and quality of life at work. In Reis (Issue 92, p. 11). JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.2307/40184292

Karen Andrea Mora-Durán, Daniela Estrada-Martínez, José Alejandro Ruiz-Chamorro, Lizeth Carolina Luna-Lagos, & Diego Fernando Rosero-Rosero. (2019). Individual and collective well-being of people accessing health services. In Biumar Magazine (Vol. 3, Issue 1, pp. 20–25). Universidad Mariana. https://doi.org/10.31948/biumar3-1-art2

Blesa Matienzo, MD (2020). Health, well-being, and lifestyle from a gender perspective. In Advances in Psychology (Vol. 28, Issue 2, pp. 205–212). Universidad Femenina Del Sagrado Corazon. https://doi.org/10.33539/avpsicol.2020.v28n2.2249

Oliveira, J.T., & Crispim, SF (2020). MUDANÇAS NO BUSINESS MODEL AND ALINHAMENTO DA ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE. In Gestão & Regionalidade (Vol. 36, Issue 108). USCS Municipal University of Sao Caetano do Sul. https://doi.org/10.13037/gr.vol36n108.5689

Fuster, Y. (2020). Healthy organizations. In Brazilian Journal of Information Science: research trends (Vol. 14, Issue 3, p. e020002). Faculty of Philosophy and Sciences. https://doi.org/10.36311/1940-1640.2020.v14n3.10059

(2020). Telemedicine: Its role in healthcare organizations. In REVISTA MEDICA DEL URUGUAY (Vol. 36, Issue 1). Revista Medica del Uruguay. https://doi.org/10.29193/rmu.36.4.9

Irusta, J., & Ingrassia, R. (2020). Case study: organizational environment of remote work. In Research Reports. IIATA. (Vol. 5, Issue 5, pp. 183–194). National University of Rosario. https://doi.org/10.35305/iiata.v5i5.20

Fussi, PV (2020). Mental Health and Social Work: In Parallel Chair (Issue 16, pp. 183–207). National University of Rosario. https://doi.org/10.35305/cp.vi16.9

(nd). Implementation of an Occupational Health and Safety Management System Based on the Ecuador Model . Training, Research and Publication Center (POCAIP). https://doi.org/10.23857/dom.cien.pocaip.2017.3.4.oct.264-283

Moreira Castellanos, C. (2020). OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH FOCUSED ON THE WORLD OF ORGANIZATIONS. In Occupational Safety and Health Management (Vol. 1, Issue 1, p. 41). Grancolombiano Polytechnic University Institution. https://doi.org/10.15765/gsst.v1i1.1586

González Caballero, J. (2019). Occupational Nursing: Added Value for Organizations. In Occupational Medicine and Safety (Vol. 65, Issue 254, pp. 3–9). SciELO Spain/Repisalud. https://doi.org/10.4321/s0465-546×2019000100003

Fierro-Celis, FA (2020). Organizational change: a model that dynamizes transformation. In Revista Escuela de Administración de Negocios (Issue 88, pp. 13–31). Universidad EAN. https://doi.org/10.21158/01208160.n88.2020.2560

(2019a). Organizational consulting process: A conceptual model. In Venezuelan Journal of Management . University of Zulia. https://doi.org/10.37960/revista.v24i88.30181

Novaes Pillar de Oliveira Castro, L., Baita dos Reis, T., Pinheiro Dos Santos, EL, Silva Machado, G., & Candiano Rangel, R. (2016). ORGANIZATIONAL CLIMATE: RESEARCH MODEL TWO FACTORS OF SATISFAÇÃO NO WORK AND ORGANIZATIONAL ENVIRONMENT. In Humanas & Sociais Aplicadas (Vol. 6, Issue 16). Higher Institutes of Ensino do Censa. https://doi.org/10.25242/887661620161033

Parolin, M.A. (2009). Organizational culture and management styles in healthcare organizations. In SaberEs (Issue 1). National University of Rosario. https://doi.org/10.35305/s.v0i1.10

Segredo-Pérez, A.M., García-Milian, A.J., López-Puig, P., León-Cabrera, P., & Perdomo-Victoria, I. (2017). Organizational communication as a necessary dimension for measuring the climate in public health organizations. In Horizonte Sanitario (Vol. 16, Issue 1, pp. 28–37). Universidad Juárez Autonoma de Tabasco. https://doi.org/10.19136/hs.a16n1.1256

Gómez Ramírez, O.Y., Henao Castaño, A.M., Fuentes Ramírez, A.L., Díaz Heredia, L.P., & Molano-Pirazán, M.L. (2018). Spiritual well-being in the hospital setting: Contributions to the humanization of health. In Latin American Journal of Bioethics (Vol. 19, Issues 36–1, pp. 49–60). New Granada Military University. https://doi.org/10.18359/rlbi.3627

Sánchez Estrada, M. (2011). Positive Psychology: Its Relationship to Health and Well-being. In Desbordes. Research Journal. School of Social Sciences, Arts and Humanities – UNAD (Vol. 2, Issue 1, p. 39). National Open and Distance University. https://doi.org/10.22490/25394150.1191

(2019b). The Logics of Moral Work in Telemedicine: Disputes Surrounding the Legitimacy of Digital Health Policies. In Psychology, Knowledge and Society (Vol. 9, Issue 2). Psychology, Knowledge and Society. https://doi.org/10.26864/pcs.v9.n2.11

Goilean, C., Gracia, F.J., Tomás, I.T., & Subirats, M. (2020). Mindfulness in Work and Organizations. In Psychologist Papers (Vol. 41, Issue 2). Psicofundación Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.23923/pap.psicol2020.2929

Arce Solano, J.L., Godoy Sandoval, V., Gutiérrez Durán, J.E., & Chinchilla, A.R. (2019). Strategic planning models tailored to networked organizations and collaborative work: Application to a real-life case study. In UNED Research Journal (Vol. 11, Issue 3). Universidad Estatal a Distancia. https://doi.org/10.22458/urj.v11i3.2621

Jiménez Figueroa, A., & Gómez Urrutia, V. (2014). Family co-responsibility, organizational practices, work-family balance, and subjective well-being in Chile. In Civilizar (Vol. 14, Issue 27, pp. 85–96). Universidad Sergio Arboleda. https://doi.org/10.22518/16578953.181